Studi Fenomenologi Kebermaknaan Program Literasi bagi Guru dan Siswa di SMK Negeri 2 Sewon

  • Arifah Suryaningsih SMK Negeri 2 Sewon, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta,  Indonesia

Abstract

The low interest in reading has prompted the emergence of various innovative literacy programs in schools. However, many of these programs still rely primarily on quantitative measures of achievement, leaving their meaningfulness for teachers and students insufficiently understood. This study aims to uncover the meaning and essence of teachers’ and students’ experiences in implementing the “Jus Carica” literacy program at SMK Negeri 2 Sewon and to provide evidence-based recommendations for improving school literacy policies. A qualitative study with a transcendental phenomenology design (Moustakas, 1994) was employed, and data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis involving two teachers and three students with varying levels of reading interest. Data analysis was conducted through the stages of epoché, horizonalization, thematic clustering, the development of textural–structural descriptions, and synthesis of essence. The findings reveal that the program’s meaningfulness lies in the transformation of teachers’ roles from supervisors to facilitators, the enhancement of students’ self-confidence, greater personal relevance through autonomous theme selection, and flexible learning processes that foster creativity despite various constraints. The study concludes that the sustainability of the program depends on the provision of autonomy, humanistic facilitation, and methodological flexibility. Prospectively, similar models may be replicated in other vocational schools with appropriate contextual adaptation.

 

Keywords: school literacy, phenomenology, teacher experience, student experience, vocational school

PDF Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Arifah Suryaningsih, SMK Negeri 2 Sewon, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta

Arifah Suryaningsih, saat ini sedang menyelesaikan studi doktoral bidang Manajemen Pendidikan di UNY melalui Beasiswa Pendidikan Indonesia (BPI) tahun 2022. Berbagai tulisan opini pendidikan dan resensi bukunya sering menghiasi media massa, baik lokal maupun nasional. Penulis beberapa buku pendidikan dan mata pelajaran jenjang SMK.   Tersertifikasi sebagai penulis buku non fiksi dari BNSP dan sejak tahun 2023 menjadi  tim penilai Buku Teks Pendamping (BTP) Jenjang SMK/MAK Pusat Perbukuan Kemdikdasmen hingga sekarang.

Published
2025-12-12
How to Cite:
Suryaningsih, A. (2025). Studi Fenomenologi Kebermaknaan Program Literasi bagi Guru dan Siswa di SMK Negeri 2 Sewon . Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 10(3), 2041-2047. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v10i3.2185
Section
Research Articles
Abstract viewed: 36 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded: 23 times

References

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

Gee, J. P. (2015). The new literacy studies. In The Routledge handbook of literacy studies (pp. 35-48). Routledge.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Merga, M. K. (2017). What would make children read for pleasure more frequently?. English in Education, 51(2), 207-223.

Merga, M. K. (2019). How do librarians in schools support struggling readers? English in Education, 53(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2018.1558030

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2013). Educational design research. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (131–140). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_11

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.

Napitulu, E. (2023), Literasi Kini Tidak Sekadar untuk Pembelajaran. Kompas.id. diakses tanggal 10 November 2025. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/literasi-kini-tak-sekadar-untuk-pembelajaran?open_from=Search_Result_Page

Pilgreen, J. L. (2000). The SSR handbook: How to organize and manage a sustained silent reading program. Boynton/Cook Publishers.

Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage Publications.

Suryaningsih, A. (2024). Pengembangan model manajemen literasi “Jus Carica” (Jumat sehat membaca, mencari dan menggali wacana) bagi siswa SMK. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 9(2), 990-994. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v9i2.952

Suswandari, M. (2018). Membangun budaya literasi bagi suplemen pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Dikdas Bantara, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.32585/jdb.v1i1.105

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2015). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2015 tentang Penumbuhan Budi Pekerti. Jakarta: Kemdikbud.