Development of Teacher Innovativeness Instruments in the Face of Educational Innovation

  • Jumini Jumini SMK Negeri 1 Kalasan, Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta,  Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v8i2.523

Abstract

Teachers had different responses in facing top-down educational innovation. Hence, policymakers must create a map to implement a more effective strategy for innovation success. This study aimed to develop a teacher innovativeness instrument through theoretical development methods. Based on the synthesis of the theoretical research, five indicators were obtained and expanded into 25 four-scale Likert statements. Content validity was proven by eight experts and then quantified by the Aiken formula, resulting in a coefficient of 0.84 or a high category. The trial was conducted on 85 teachers from various levels and regions in Indonesia to get empirical data. Construct validity was proven by Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and resulted in four factors with Eigenvalue > 1 which were factors that underlie the level of teachers innovativeness, namely volition, coverage novelty, structural obedience, and environmental communication. The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) extraction and Varimax rotation proved that all items had good criteria because their factor loading was> 0.4, proving the construct validity. The instrument reliability estimated by the Cronbach Alpha formula resulted in a reliability coefficient of 0.954, or a very high category. Thus, this instrument qualifies as a good instrument and could be utilized singly or with the addition of supporting instruments.

Keywords: construct validity, educational innovations, exploratory factor analysis, teachers innovativeness

PDF Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jumini Jumini, SMK Negeri 1 Kalasan, Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta

Jumini lahir di Nganjuk, 9 Januari 1983 dan aktif sebagai guru matematika di SMK Negeri 1 Kalasan sejak tahun 2006 hingga sekarang. Pendidikan S1 di prodi Pendidikan Matematika di Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta yang ditempuh pada tahun 2000 hingga 2004, sedangkan pendidikan S2 ditempuh di universitas yang sama akan tetapi dengan prodi Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan pada tahun 2020 hingga 2022.

Published
2023-02-07
How to Cite:
Jumini, J. (2023). Development of Teacher Innovativeness Instruments in the Face of Educational Innovation. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 8(2), 247-256. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v8i2.523
Issue
Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): Edisi Mei 2023
Section
Research Articles

Copyright (c) 2023 Jumini

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract viewed: 188 times
PDF downloaded: 215 times

References

Afandi, M., MS., Z., & Neolaka, A. (2021). Causative Correlation of Teacher’s Motivation and Discipline in Banyumanik, Semarang City. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 507–520. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14130a

Andarwulan, T., Fajri, T. A. Al, & Damayanti, G. (2021). Elementary Teachers’ Readiness toward the Online Learning Policy in the New Normal Era during Covid-19. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 771–786. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14345a

Artacho, E. G., Martinez, T. S., Martin, J. L. O., Marin, J. A. M., & Garcia, G. G. (2020). Teacher Training in Lifelong Learning—The Importance of Digital Competence in the Encouragement of Teaching Innovation. Sustainability, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072852

Asbari, M., Santoso, P., & Purwanto, A. (2019). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Perilaku Kerja Inovatif Pada Industri 4.0. JIMUPB Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 8(1).

Azwar, S. (2016). Tes Prestasi (2nd ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Baroroh, A. (2013). Analisis Multivariat dan Time Series dengan SPSS 21. Jakarta: Alex Media Komputindo.

Cholifah, P. S., Oktaviani, H. I., Nuraini, N. L. S., Meidina, A. M., Wanodyaningtyas, R. F., & Yafie, E. (2019). Online Project-Based Learning for Improving the Innovative Initiation during Diffusion and Innovation Course. 2019 5th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET). Malang: IEEE. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET48172.2019.8987221

Goel, A., & Agarwal, E. (2019). Assessing Innovation in teacher Education. Globus: Journal of Progressive Education, 9(2).

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analyisis Seventh Edition. New York: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hardianto, Hidayat, & Zulkifli. (2021). Perilaku Kerja Inovatif Bagi Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia, 7(1), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.29210/02021937

Istiyono, E. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian dan Analisis Hasil Belajar Fisika Dengan Teori Tes Klasik dan Modern (First). Yogyakarta: UNY Press.

Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran Penilaian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.

Mukhlis, M., & Tohir, M. (2019). Instrumen Pengukur Creativity And Innovation Skills Siswa Sekolah Menengah di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Mathematics and Natural Science Education, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.35719/mass.v1i1.1

Nasierowski, W., & Arcelus, F. J. (2012). What is Innovativeness: Literature Review. Foundations of Management, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2013-0004

Nurosis. (1986). SPSS/PC+for the imbbc/xt/ at. Chicago: SPSS Inc.

Retnawati, H. (2016). Validitas Reliabilitas & Karakteristik Butir. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.

Rusdiana, H. A. (2014). Konsep Inovasi Pendidikan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Schermerhorn, J. R., Hunt, J. G., Osborn, R. N., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2010). Organizational Behavior (11th ed.). New Jersey: Wiley.

Seechaliao, T. (2017). Instructional Strategies to Support Creativity and Innovation in Education. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n4p201

Sharma, S. (1996). Applied Multivariate Techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Suarta, I. M., & Suwintana, I. K. (2012). Model Pengukuran Konstruks Adopsi Inovasi E-Learning. Journal of Information System, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.21609/jsi.v8i1.317

Sunardi, S., Sunaryo, W., & Laihad, G. H. (2019). Peningkatan Keinovatifan Melalui Pengembangan Kepemimpinan Transformasional dan Efikasi Diri. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 7(1).

Syarafuddin, Asrul, & Mesiono. (2012). Inovasi Pendidikan. Medan: Perdana Publishing.

Usmayadi, D., Hardhienata, S., & Hidayat, N. (2020). Peningkatan Keinovatifan Guru Melalui Penguatan Kompetensi Pedagogik dan Learning Organization. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.33751/jmp.v8i2.2765

Waliyuddin, D. S., & Sulisworo, D. (2022). Tes Instrumen Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi dan Keterampilan Literasi Digital. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 7(1), 47-52. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v7i1.310

Wardhana, A. C., & Fitriana, G. F. (2021). Designing an application for measuring innovation readiness level using the user experience lifecycle. Teknologi: Jurnal Ilmiah Sistem Informas, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.26594/teknologi.v11i1.20

Wells, W. D., & Prerisky, D. (1996). Customer Behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Wilkie, W. L. (1990). Customer Behavior. Canada: John Wiley & Sons.

Yulanda, M. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Pengukuran Karakter Inovatif Pada Masa Pra Remaja. Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling Indonesia, 6(1).

Zainal, M. A., Matore, M. E. E. M., Musa, W. N. W., & Hashim, N. H. (2020). Content Validity of Teacher Innovative Behaviour Measurement Instruments Using Content Validity Ratio (CVR) Method. Akademika, 90(1). https://doi.org/10.17576/akad-2020-90IK3-04