The Effectiveness of Technology-Based Learning Methods on Literacy and Understanding of Fiction and Nonfiction Books Among Junior High School Students

  • Eka Ayu Amelia Putri Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali,  Indonesia
  • I Gede Ratnaya Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali,  Indonesia
  • Nyoman Trisna Herawati Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali,  Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the technology-based learning method in improving junior high school students’ literacy and comprehension of fiction and non-fiction books. The research employed a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design (Nonequivalent Control Group Design), involving two classes: an experimental class using the technology-based learning method and a control class using conventional teaching methods. The research instrument was a reading literacy test consisting of 25 multiple-choice questions. Data were analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test, Levene’s test for homogeneity, independent-samples t-test, N-Gain calculation, and effect size measurement. The results showed a significant difference between the posttest scores of the experimental and control classes, with a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05. The average N-Gain score in the experimental class was 0.632 (moderate category) with an effectiveness level of 63.20%, while the control class scored 0.213 (low category). The effect size value of 1.255 was categorized as large, indicating a substantial influence of the technology-based learning method on improving students’ literacy and reading comprehension. These findings suggest that technology-based learning is worth implementing as an alternative instructional strategy to enhance students’ reading literacy in fiction and non-fiction materials.

Keywords: technology-based learning, reading literacy, fiction books, non-fiction

PDF Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2026-04-02
How to Cite:
Putri, E. A. A., Ratnaya, I. G., & Herawati, N. T. (2026). The Effectiveness of Technology-Based Learning Methods on Literacy and Understanding of Fiction and Nonfiction Books Among Junior High School Students . Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 10(3), 2488-2493. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v10i3.2099
Section
Research Articles
Abstract viewed: 28 times
PDF downloaded: 5 times

References

Agojo, H. P. C., & Cabral, D. M. (2024). A Study on Literacy Enhancement: Assessing the Impact of Technology-Assisted Reading Instruction on English Language Learners. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(12), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v8i12.7662

Akor, S. O. (2024). Measuring the impact of information literacy programs on student success: a review. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education, 3, 74. https://doi.org/10.56294/mw202474

Alfaruque, S. Y., Sultana, S., Rastogi, R., & Jabeen, Z. (2022). Integrating Literature with Technology and Use of Digital Tools: Impact on Learning Outcomes. World Journal of English Language, 13(1), 278. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n1p278

Al-Kassab, M. M., & Majeed, A. H. (2022). The Use Of Two-Sample T-Test In The Real Data. Advances and Applications in Statistics, 81, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.17654/0972361722071

Ashford, R. (2024). The Role of Interactive Reading Strategies in Enhancing Reading Comprehension of Lower Primary Students. Research and Advances in Education, 3(12), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.56397/RAE.2024.12.07

Bernal, Y. M. A., & Dominguez, D. S. L. (2023). Critical Literacy In An EFL Learning Virtual Course. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(3), 5278–5299. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i3.6549

Bilad, M. R., Zubaidah, S., & Prayogi, S. (2024). Addressing the PISA 2022 Results: A Call for Reinvigorating Indonesia’s Education System. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v3i1.1935

Bruglera, P. (2024). The Effectiveness of Digital Learning Platforms in Enhancing Student Engagement and Academic Performance. Journal of Education, Humanities, and Social Research, 1(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.70088/xq3gy756

Cinganotto, L., & Cuccurullo, D. (2019). Rethinking literacy in the 21st century: A pluriliteracies approach to CLIL. Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature, 43(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.17951/lsmll.2019.43.3.3-11

Cohen, Y. (2019). The Handbook of Cognition and Assessment; Frameworks, Methodologies, and Applications. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(5), 630–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1597679

Dahl-Leonard, K., Hall, C., & Peacott, D. (2024). A meta-analysis of technology-delivered literacy instruction for elementary students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(3), 1507–1538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10354-0

Di Pietro, G., & Castaño Muñoz, J. (2025). A meta-analysis on the effect of technology on the achievement of less advantaged students. Computers & Education, 226, 105197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105197

Duterte, J. P. (2024). Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments: Improving Engagement and Learning. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(X), 1305–1314. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8100111

Faza, A., & Lestari, I. A. (2025). Self-Regulated Learning in the Digital Age: A Systematic Review of Strategies, Technologies, Benefits, and Challenges. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 26(2), 23–58. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v26i2.8119

Ferreira, H., de Oliveira, G. P., Araújo, R., Dorça, F., & Cattelan, R. (2019). Technology-enhanced assessment visualization for smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0096-z

Gameil, A. A., & Al-Abdullatif, A. M. (2023). Using Digital Learning Platforms to Enhance the Instructional Design Competencies and Learning Engagement of Preservice Teachers. Education Sciences, 13(4), 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040334

Gulay, S. M. E., & Pontillas, P. V. (2024). Reading Motivation and Engagement among Grade IV Learners of Opol West District Schools. International Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research And Analysis, 07(08). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i08-40

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Hu, Y., & Plonsky, L. (2021). Statistical assumptions in L2 research: A systematic review. Second Language Research, 37(1), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319877433

Liu, S., Reynolds, B. L., Thomas, N., & Soyoof, A. (2024). The Use of Digital Technologies to Develop Young Children’s Language and Literacy Skills: A Systematic Review. Sage Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241230850

Luo, S., King, R. B., Wang, F., & Leung, S. on. (2024). English digital reading achievement for East Asian students: identifying the key predictors using a machine learning approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2398120

Noordan, M. N. H. bin, & Md. Yunus, M. (2022). Using Digital Comprehension to Improve Reading Comprehension Skills among Young Learners. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i2/13208

Nurhayati, Ernalida, Syarifuddin, Sholikhah, H. A., & Firanata, A. (2023). Development of Reading Literacy Assessment Questions: An Effort to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i2.5810

Rahmawati, S., Abdullah, A. G., & Widiaty, I. (2024). Teachers’ digital literacy overview in secondary school. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13(1), 597. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.25747

Schmitz, M.-L., Antonietti, C., Consoli, T., Gonon, P., Cattaneo, A., & Petko, D. (2025). Enhancing teacher collaboration for technology integration: the impact of transformational leadership. Computers & Education, 234, 105331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105331

Shelton, A., & Wexler, J. (2022). The Development of Reading Comprehension in Adolescents With Literacy Difficulties. In Handbook of Special Education Research, Volume I (pp. 272–284). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003156857-23

Shoily, R. A. (2024). Classroom Feedback In The Digital Age: A Comprehensive Analysis. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 29(10), 01–04. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2910060104

Sugiyono. (2006). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kualitatif. In Alfabeta. ALFABET. https://digilib.unigres.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail%5C&id=43

Uzorka, A., & Odebiyi, O. A. (2025). Impact of Digital Learning Tools on Student Engagement and Achievement. Journal Of Digital Learning And Distance Education, 4(1), 1436–1445. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v4i1.511

V, P. (2024). Impact of Digital Pedagogy on Student Engagement in Higher Education. International Journal of Teacher Education Research Studies (IJTERS), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.63090/IJTERS/3049.1614.0004

Venkatapuram, S. S. (2025). The Transformative Impact: Use of Technology in Elementary Education. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 6(1), 2236–2240. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.6.0125.0424