Efektivitas Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Cerita Perkalian Pecahan Berdasarkan Variasi Gaya Belajar Siswa

  • Wahyu Widianti Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta,  Indonesia
  • Yoppy Wahyu Purnomo Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta,  Indonesia
  • Fery Muhamad Firdaus Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta,  Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach compared to traditional learning methods in improving elementary school students' ability to solve math problems, by considering differences in learning styles (visual, auditory, and kinesthetic). This study used a pseudo-experimental method with a posttest-only control group design. The subjects consisted of two groups of grade VI students who each received different treatments, namely learning with the RME approach and conventional learning. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA to identify the effect of each variable, namely the type of learning approach, type of learning style, as well as the interaction between them on mathematics learning outcomes. The results of the analysis showed that the RME approach was significantly superior in improving students' math solving ability compared to the conventional approach. In addition, a significant effect of learning styles was found, where students with visual and kinesthetic learning styles showed higher achievement than students with auditory learning styles. The interaction between learning approach and learning style was also found to be significant on students' math problem solving ability. These findings underscore the importance of applying contextual learning approaches that are aligned with students' learning characteristics to improve the quality of mathematics learning at the primary school level.

Keywords: Realistic Mathematics Education, learning styles, math problem solving

PDF Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2025-10-31
How to Cite:
Widianti, W., Purnomo, Y. W., & Firdaus, F. M. (2025). Efektivitas Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Cerita Perkalian Pecahan Berdasarkan Variasi Gaya Belajar Siswa. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v10i3.1957
Section
Research Articles
Abstract viewed: 99 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded: 20 times

References

Ayuningsih, R., Setyowati, R. D., & Utami, R. E. (2020). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Program Linear Berdasarkan Teori Kesalahan Kastolan. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2(6), 510–518. https://doi.org/10.26877/imajiner.v2i6.6790

Chislett, V., & Chapman, A. (2005). VAK Learning Styles Self-Assessment Questionnaire. Retrieved June, 26, 2006.

DePascale, M., & Ramani, G. (2024). The Role of Math Games for Children’s Early Math Learning: A Systematic Review. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xkvhb

Farida, F., Hartatiana, H., & Joemsittiprasert, W. (2019). The Use of Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) in Improving Mathematical Analogical Ability and Habits of Mind. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v10i2.3540

Firdaus, F. M., Fadhilah, N., Wuryandari, I. T., & Fadhli, R. (2024). Liveworksheet Interactive E-Module Effect on Equal Fractions Comprehension at 4th Grade Elementary School. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 12(1), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v12i1.64526

Freudenthal, H. (2002). Revisiting Mathematics Education (Vol. 9). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47202-3

Gabriel, F., Coché, F., Szucs, D., Carette, V., Rey, B., & Content, A. (2013). A componential view of children’s difficulties in learning fractions. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00715

Gowers, S. J. (2022). Mapping young children’s conceptualisations of the images they encounter in their familiar environments. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 22(2), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798420919479

Hidayah, N., Rofiqoh, R., Dewi, A. K., & Suriaman, A. (2022). Correlation Between Learning Styles And Academic Achievement. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains Sosial, Dan Agama, 8(2), 548–557. https://doi.org/10.53565/pssa.v8i2.534

Ismiasih, N. (2023). Analisis kesalahan Siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika melalui tahap Newman. Primatika : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.30872/primatika.v12i2.2698

Jewitt, C. (2009). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (Vol. 1). Routledge London.

Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 850–867. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014939

Kamil, F. (2023). Matematika Sebagai Fondasi Kritis Dalam Menaklukkan Tantangan Soal Fisika. JEAS (Journal of Educational and Applied Science), 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.30739/jeas.v1i1.2486

Khairunnisaa’, D. M., & Sutarni, S. (2024). Analisis Kesalahan Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Materi Pecahan Berdasarkan Newman’s Error Analysis. Teorema: Teori Dan Riset Matematika, 9(2), 221. https://doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v9i2.15403

Klang, N., Karlsson, N., Kilborn, W., Eriksson, P., & Karlberg, M. (2021). Mathematical Problem-Solving Through Cooperative Learning—The Importance of Peer Acceptance and Friendships. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.710296

Li, W., Yu, J., Zhang, Z., & Liu, X. (2022). Dual Coding or Cognitive Load? Exploring the Effect of Multimodal Input on English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Vocabulary Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.834706

Monika, D., & Ramadan, Z. H. (2022). Student Worksheet Based on Realistic Mathematics Education Approach on Multiplication and Division Material for Grade V Elementary School. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 6(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v6i1.41627

Newton, K. J., Willard, C., & Teufel, C. (2014). An Examination of the Ways That Students with Learning Disabilities Solve Fraction Computation Problems. The Elementary School Journal, 115(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1086/676949

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Pangestu, K. D. J., Zuhri, M. S., & Sugiyanti, S. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Berdasarkan Tahapan Pemecahan Masalah Polya Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 3(3), 206–214. https://doi.org/10.26877/imajiner.v3i3.7547

Parida, I., Winarsih, M., & Maksum, A. (2018). Improving the Ability of Mathematic Communication through the Realistic Mathematic Education Approach (RME) at the Student Class Iv New SDN Karang 04 Cikarang Utara-Bekasi. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(8), 1063–1071. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-6-8-1

Purnomo, Y. W., Pasri, Aziz, T. A., Shahrill, M., & Prananto, I. W. (2022). Students’ failure to understand fraction multiplication as part of a quantity. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(4), 681–702. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i4.pp681-702

Purnomo, Y. W., Safitri, E., Rohmah, N., Rahmawati, R. D., & Abbas, N. (2021). Parental Involvement in Online Mathematics Learning: Examining Student Report and Links with Engagement. New Educational Review, 66(December), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2021.66.4.10

Putri, A. D., Juandi, D., & Turmudi, T. (2024). Realistic mathematics education and mathematical literacy: a meta-analysis conducted on studies in Indonesia. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(4), 1468–1476. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21650

Rusdi, Arnawa, I. M., Fauzan, A., & Lufri. (2023). The Validity of Mathematics Learning Model Based on Realistics Mathematics Education and Literacy in SMP. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i4.12925

Setiyawati, E., Fauziati, E., Darsinah, Minsih, & Prastiwi, Y. (2022). Problem Solving Errors in Mathematics Story Questions. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 11(3), 466–479. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v11i3.46980

Siegler, R. S., & Lortie-Forgues, H. (2015). Conceptual knowledge of fraction arithmetic. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 909–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000025

Skemp, R. R. (2012). The Psychology of Learning Mathematics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203396391

Tobroni, T., Rasilah, R., & Widiyanti, W. (2023). Model Deployment Realistic Mathematics Education to Improve Student Learning Outcomes Grade 5. Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion, 2(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v2i1.67

Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Ascd.

Trisnawati, T., Pratiwi, R., & Waziana, W. (2018). The effect of realistic mathematics education on student’s mathematical communication ability. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 1(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v1i1.741

Yuanita, P., Zulnaidi, H., & Zakaria, E. (2018). The effectiveness of Realistic Mathematics Education approach: The role of mathematical representation as mediator between mathematical belief and problem solving. PLOS ONE, 13(9), e0204847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204847

Zakaria, E., & Syamaun, M. (2017). The Effect of Realistic Mathematics Education Approach on Students’ Achievement And Attitudes Towards Mathematics. Mathematics Education Trends and Research, 2017(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.5899/2017/metr-00093

Zalfa, S. N. E., & Rahmawati, N. D. (2024). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Pada Soal Cerita Materi Statistika. Cartesian: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.33752/cartesian.v4i1.6648