Representasi Kekuasaan Simbolik dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Kurikulum Merdeka Kelas X (Kajian Wacana Kritis Pierre Bourdieu)

  • Uswatun Hasanah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan,  Indonesia
  • Jufri Jufri Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Jerman Universitas Negeri Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan,  Indonesia
  • Muhammad Saleh Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Universitas Negeri Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan,  Indonesia

Abstract

This research aims to describe the representation of symbolic power in the implementation of Merdeka Curriculum-based learning in class X SMAN 9 Gowa, based on Pierre Bourdieu's critical discourse study. Pierre Bourdieu's critical discourse study. The main focus of this research is describing the forms of symbolic power through the elements of euphemization and censorship in communication between teachers and students. Data collection techniques through direct observation direct observation, recording conversations, and taking notes during the learning process. The result The results show that symbolic power is reflected in two main elements main elements: euphemization with 18 forms including; 1) Request, 2) request, 3) necessity, 4) obligation, 5) Discipline, 6) Efficiency, 7) Appreciation, 8) Distrust, 9) Confidence, 10) Competence, 11) Incompetence, 12) Comfort, 13) Expectation, 14) Policy, 15) Generosity, 16) Help, 17) Caring  and 18) Usability. and sensorization with 9 forms including; 1) worship, 2) marginalization, 3) threat, 4) coercion, 5) disappointment, 6) prohibition, and 7) asking for leniency, 8) Disobedience, and 9) Selfishness. In conclusion, in the context of learning, teachers still holds the dominant authority, while students tend to accept the situation as a form of discipline. as a form of discipline.

Keywords: Power, Symbolic, Euphemization, Censorship

PDF Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2025-03-07
How to Cite:
Hasanah, U., Jufri, J., & Saleh, M. (2025). Representasi Kekuasaan Simbolik dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Kurikulum Merdeka Kelas X (Kajian Wacana Kritis Pierre Bourdieu). Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 10(2), 1167-1177. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v10i2.1783
Section
Research Articles
Abstract viewed: 53 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded: 16 times

References

Apriliana, A. A. (2021). Kekerasan Simbolik oleh Guru PLB di SLB Negeri Gunungsari Baureno Bojonegoro. Paradigma, 10(1).

Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique, Paris: Les Edition Minuit.

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Polity.

Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford University Press.

Fatmawati, N. I., & Sholikin, A. (2020). Pierre Bourdieu dan Konsep Dasar Kekerasan Simbolik. Madani Jurnal Politik Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 12(1), 41–60.

Jufri, J., & Tolla, Achmad. (2015). Struktur Makna Simbolik dalam Wacana Korupsi Fenomena Pasca Reformasi: Kajian Kritis. Makassar: Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Negeri Makassar.

Putri, R. O. (2020). Kekerasan Simbolik (Studi Relasi Pendidik dan Peserta Didik). FITRAH: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 5(1), 55–82.

Rusdiarti, S. R. (2004). Bahasa, Kapital Simbolik, dan Pertarungan Kekuasaan: Tinjauan Filsafat Sosial Pierre Bourdieu'anteing (Doctoral dissertation, FIB-UI).

Siswadi, G. A. (2024). Reproduksi Kekuasaan melalui Kekerasan Simbolik dalam Sistem Pendidikan: Analisis Kritis Pemikiran Pierre Bourdieu. Widya Aksara: Jurnal Agama Hindu, 29(1), 21–31.

Ulfah. (2013). Kekerasan Simbolik dalam Wacana Pembelajaran. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan INSANI, 14(1), 51–58.