Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika pada Siswa SD Negeri 1 Gresik Kelas IV

  • Shifa Yuliana Sabitafh Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik, Gresik, Jawa Timur,  Indonesia
  • Afakhrul Masub Bachtiar Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik, Gresik, Jawa Timur,  Indonesia

Abstract

This research was conducted with the aim of analyzing the influence of teaching methods on mathematics learning outcomes in class IV students at SD Negeri 1 Gresik. The problem raised is the lack of understanding of mathematical concepts among students which is caused by less interesting learning methods. The research method used was a quantitative and qualitative design, with a sample consisting of 30 students selected randomly. Data was collected through mathematics learning outcomes tests and analyzed using statistical analysis to determine the significance of the influence of learning methods. The research results show that the use of active learning methods, such as picture collaboration, guided learning at home, and text learning, can significantly improve students' mathematics learning outcomes. Students who engage in active learning show better understanding and higher test scores compared to conventional methods. Future prospects, this research can be a reference for developing more innovative and effective learning methods in improving the quality of mathematics education in elementary schools. The conclusion of this research is that mathematics teachers should apply student-centered teaching methods and facilitate student participation in learning activities.

Keywords: learning methods, mathematics learning outcomes.

PDF Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2025-01-12
How to Cite:
Sabitafh, S. Y., & Bachtiar, A. M. (2025). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika pada Siswa SD Negeri 1 Gresik Kelas IV. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 10(1), 767-773. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v10i1.1576
Section
Research Articles
Abstract viewed: 104 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded: 67 times

References

Adisaka, K., Margunayasa, I.G., & Gunartha, I.W. (2022). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Kolaboratif Terhadap Minat Dan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas V. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti.

Astuti, G. (2021). Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme Pada Materi Mengurutkan Pecahan Siswa Kelas VI SD Negeri Majingklak 01 Tahun Pelajaran 2020/2021. Jurnal Pendidikan Tuntas.

Astuti, G., Barone, G., Di Gristina, E., Domina, G., Giacò, A., Orsenigo, S., & Peruzzi, L. (2021). Chromosome numbers for the Italian flora: 11. Italian Botanist, 11, 145-153. https://doi.org/10.3897/italianbotanist.11.70173[4][7][10][13][16][19][22].

Astuti, G., Bartolucci, F., Conti, F., Cera, B., Giacò, A., Orsenigo, S., Sandroni, L., & Peruzzi, L. (2021). Chromosome numbers for the Italian flora: 12. Italian Botanist, 12, 123-131. https://doi.org/10.3897/italianbotanist.12.79031[19] .

Fajriyanti, L.D., Fauziyah, N., & Alfiansyah, I. (2019). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Model Inkuiri Dan Konvensional Subtema Lingkungan Tempat Tinggalku Siswa Kelas Iv Sekolah Dasar. JTIEE (Journal of Teaching in Elementary Education).

Fraser, J., & Yasnitsky, A. (2016). Deconstructing Vygotsky's victimization narrative: A re-examination of the 'stalinist suppression' of Vygotskian theory. History & Humaniora Science, 28, 128-153.

Friesem, Y. (2019). Teaching truth, lies, and accuracy in the digital age: Media literacy as project-based learning. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 74(2), 185-198.

Hendrowati, T. Y. (2015). Pembentukan Pengetahuan Lingkaran Melalui Pembelajaran Asimilasi dan Akomodasi Teori Konstruktivisme Piaget. Proceedings of the Conference on Research in Education.

Indriani, N., Fitrianti, Y., & Nailah, C. (2022). Modifikasi Strategi dan Metode Pembelajaran Matematika Guna Menarik Minat Belajar Siswa SD/MI. JPG: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru. https://doi.org/10.32832/jpg.v3i1.6355

Maslow, A. H. (2020). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row.

Ormrod, J. E. (2011). Educational Psychology: Developing Learners. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Piaget, J. (1950). The Psychology of Intelligence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Posasi, S. (2017). Pengembangan CD Pembelajaran Matematika Berbantuan Software Geogebra dengan Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Berbasis Teori Jean Piaget pada Materi Kubus dan Balok. Proceedings of the Conference on Educational Media.

Rogers, C. R. (2020). Freedom to Learn for the 80's. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.

Sutomo, E. (2015). Konstruktivistik dan pembelajaran: berdasarkan teori Humanistik. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(1), 1-10 .

Trianto. (2019). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu, Konsep, Strategi dan Implementasinya dalam KTSP. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Utami, M. S. (2020). Panduan dan Aplikasi Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. NOKTAH.

Vasileva, O., & Balyasnikova, N. (2019). (Re)Introducing Vygotsky's thought: From historical overview to contemporary psychology. Frontier Psychology, 10, 1-15.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (2019). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wahyudin, D. (2016). Manajemen kurikulum dalam pendidikan profesi guru: studi kasus di Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Jurnal Kependidikan, 46(2), 259-270.

Wertsch, J. V. (2023). Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.