Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi melalui Tugas Membaca: Studi Kasus pada Mahasiswa Desain Pembelajaran

  • Hery Yanto The Sekolah Tinggi Agama Buddha Nalanda, Jakarta Timur, DKI Jakarta,  Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v9i1.800

Abstrak

Studi kasus ini melihat pengaruh pembelajaran berbasis tugas terhadap kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi (HOTS) mahasiswa pada tugas mata kuliah Desain Pembelajaran. Mahasiswa menyelesaikan tugas dalam bahasa Indonesia setelah mempelajari modul dalam bahasa Inggris atau dengan menerjemahkannya ke bahasa Indonesia. Empat puluh tujuh mahasiswa berpartisipasi dalam proses pembelajaran. Mahasiswa melakukan refleksi belajar setelah mengerjakan tugas untuk mengevaluasi HOTS. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pembelajaran berbasis tugas memiliki dampak yang positif terhadap HOTS. Membaca secara ekstensif, dengan atau tanpa bantuan alat penerjemahan, dapat meningkatkan pemahaman. Tes objektif yang dirancang dengan baik memberikan evaluasi yang efektif terhadap pemahaman konsep. Refleksi menunjukkan tantangan yang dihadapi siswa dalam pembelajaran, menggarisbawahi pentingnya membaca komprehensif dan membaca berulang-ulang agar dapat berhasil menyelesaikan tugas. Penelitian ini memperkuat bukti bahwa pembelajaran berbasis tugas dapat meningkatkan HOTS, menunjukkan manfaat menyeluruh dari membaca komprehensif dan perlunya evaluasi yang dirancang dengan baik serta evaluasi diri.

Kata Kunci: keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi, tugas membaca, studi kasus, desain pembelajaran

Data Unduhan PDF

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Biografi Penulis

Hery Yanto The, Sekolah Tinggi Agama Buddha Nalanda, Jakarta Timur, DKI Jakarta

Hery Yanto The merupakan peneliti di bidang desain pembelajaran, integrasi teknologi pendidikan, dan analisis multimodal. Sebelum bergabung dengan STAB Nalanda pada tahun 2023, mengajar di Zhejiang Yuexiu University of Foreign Languages. Sempat juga berkarya sebagai asisten riset desain instruksional di Center for Language at Technology, University of Hawaii at Manoa.  

Diterbitkan
2024-01-03
Bagaimana cara mengutip:
The, H. Y. (2024). Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi melalui Tugas Membaca: Studi Kasus pada Mahasiswa Desain Pembelajaran. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 9(1), 377-386. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v9i1.800
Terbitan
Vol 9 No 1 (2024): Edisi Januari 2024
Bagian
Artikel Penelitian

Copyright (c) 2024 Hery Yanto The

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstrak viewed: 117 times
PDF downloaded: 133 times

Referensi

Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., & Dawson, P. (2022). Feedback for learning. In International Encyclopedia of Education: Fourth Edition. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.09013-8

Alismaiel, O. A., Cifuentes-Faura, J., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2022). Online Learning, Mobile Learning, and Social Media Technologies: An Empirical Study on Constructivism Theory during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811134

Asha Priya, T., & Jayasridevi, B. (2018). Integrating translation in classroom: Facilitating language skills. In Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities (Vol. 10, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v10n1.13

Bardach, L., Klassen, R. M., Durksen, T. L., Rushby, J. V., Bostwick, K. C. P., & Sheridan, L. (2021). The power of feedback and reflection: Testing an online scenario-based learning intervention for student teachers. Computers and Education, 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104194

Cavalcanti, A. P., Barbosa, A., Carvalho, R., Freitas, F., Tsai, Y. S., Gašević, D., & Mello, R. F. (2021). Automatic feedback in online learning environments: A systematic literature review. In Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100027

Chandra Handa, M. (2019). Leading Differentiated Learning for the Gifted. Roeper Review, 41(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1585213

Chen, I. C. (2018). Incorporating task-based learning in an extensive reading programme. ELT Journal, 72(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy008

Ermerawati, A. B. (2019). The Application of Let’s Read! in Extensive Reading Class: Integrating MALL and Task-based Learning. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v6i3.20870

Hasbullah. (2020). Pemikiran Kritis John Dewey Tentang Pendidikan (Dalam Perspektif Kajian Filosofis). Tarbiyah Islamiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Agama Islam, 10(1).

Insuasty Cárdenas, A. (2020). Enhancing Reading Comprehension through an Intensive Reading Approach. HOW, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.19183/how.27.1.518

Kanda, T. (2022). [A Beginners’ Guide to Scientific Writing and Critical Reading]. Brain and Nerve = Shinkei Kenkyu No Shinpo, 74(4). https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.1416202038

Lap, T. Q., & Trang, H. D. (2017). The Effect of Task-Based Learning on EF Students’ Learning Reading: A Case Study in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. Studies in English Language Teaching, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v5n1p34

Lintangsari, A. P., Emaliana, I., & Kusumawardani, I. N. (2022). Improving Learners’ Critical Thinking and Learning Engagement through Socratic Questioning in Nominal Group Technique. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i2.22352

McMaster, K. L., Baker, K., Donegan, R., Hugh, M., & Sargent, K. (2021). Professional Development to Support Teachers’ Implementation of Intensive Reading Intervention: A Systematic Review. In Remedial and Special Education (Vol. 42, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932520934099

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2

Nair, L. B., Gibbert, M., & Hoorani, B. H. (2023). Introduction to Case Study Research. In Combining Case Study Designs for Theory Building. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009023283.001

O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., & Marissa, K. L. E. (2017). Multimodal analysis for critical thinking. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1101003

Ouhaichi, H., Spikol, D., & Vogel, B. (2023). Research trends in multimodal learning analytics: A systematic mapping study. In Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100136

Reeves, T. C., & Lee, C. B. (2013). Reflections on the scholarly contributions of Professor David H. Jonassen. In Computers and Education (Vol. 64). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.013

Sayaf, A. M. (2023). Adoption of E-learning systems: An integration of ISSM and constructivism theories in higher education. Heliyon, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13014

Simsek, A. (2020). Interview with David H. Jonassen: Looking at the Field of Educational Technology from Radical and Multiple Perspectives. Contemporary Educational Technology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6069

Tang, L. (2016). Exploration on Cultivation of Critical Thinking in College Intensive Reading Course. English Language Teaching, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n3p18

Thamrin, N. R., Widodo, P., & Margana. (2019). Developing Higher Order Thinking Skills (Hots) for Reading Comprehension Enhancement. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1179(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1179/1/012073

Ulanovich, O. I. (2015). Understanding of the original text while translating: Phenomenological aspects. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Filologiya, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/33/7

Van, L. H., Li, C. S., & Wan, R. (2022). Critical reading in higher education: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101028

Williams, M. K. (2017). John Dewey in the 21st century. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 9(1).