Effectiveness of Experiential Learning Based on Multiple Intelligence to Increase MI Student Learning Interest

  • Moh. Ferdi Hasan UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta,  Indonesia
  • Maemonah Maemonah UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta,  Indonesia

Abstrak

Dalam memahami pembelajaran diperlukan minat sebagai faktor utama, sedangkan untuk menumbuhkan minat diperlukan metode pembelajaran yang tepat dan efektif, dalam hal ini model experiential learning berbasis kecerdasan majemuk diharapkan dapat menjadi solusi. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui efektivitas experiential learning berbasis multiple intelligence untuk meningkatkan minat belajar siswa MI. Metode penelitian ini adalah kuantitatif dengan jenis penelitian eksperimen, jumlah partisipan sebanyak 25 orang yang merupakan siswa MI di Kab. Jember, pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan teknik kuesioner dengan prosedur pre, eksperimen dan post, sedangkan untuk uji analisisnya menggunakan uji T-Test berpasangan. Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan, didapatkan hasil bahwa experiential learning berbasis multiple intelligence secara signifikan dapat meningkatkan minat belajar siswa MI. Dengan dilakukannya penelitian ini, diharapkan para guru MI dapat menerapkan metode pembelajaran ini sehingga minat belajar siswa meningkat dan menghasilkan prestasi pada akhirnya.

Kata Kunci: Pembelajaran, Pembelajaran Berbasis Pengalaman, Kecerdasan Majemuk, Minat Belajar, Madrasah Ibtidaiyah

Data Unduhan PDF

Data unduhan belum tersedia.
Diterbitkan
2023-12-11
Bagaimana cara mengutip:
Hasan, M. F., & Maemonah, M. (2023). Effectiveness of Experiential Learning Based on Multiple Intelligence to Increase MI Student Learning Interest. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 9(1), 165-173. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v9i1.782
Bagian
Artikel Penelitian
Abstrak viewed: 190 times
PDF (English) downloaded: 105 times

Referensi

Al-Kalbani, M. S., & Al-Wahaibi, S. S. (2015). Testing the Multiple Intelligences Theory in Oman. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 190, 106–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.923

Al-Qatawneh, S. S., Alsalhi, N. R., Eltahir, M. E., & Siddig, O. A. (2021). The representation of multiple intelligences in an intermediate Arabic-language textbook, and teachers’ awareness of them in Jordanian schools. Heliyon, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07004

Beukers, E., & Bertolini, L. (2021). Learning for transitions: An experiential learning strategy for urban experiments. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 40, 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.09.004

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.

Creswell. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publication.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publication.

Cunha, C. R., Martins, C., & Mendonça, V. (2023). Using extended reality in experiential learning for hospitality management education. Procedia Computer Science, 219, 634–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.333

De Vaus, D. A. (2014). Surveys in social research. Routledge.

Ferrero, M., Vadillo, M. A., & León, S. P. (2021). A valid evaluation of the theory of multiple intelligences is not yet possible: Problems of methodological quality for intervention studies. In Intelligence (Vol. 88). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2021.101566

Flores, R., Siami Namin, A., Tavakoli, N., Siami-Namini, S., & Jones, K. S. (2021). Using experiential learning to teach and learn digital forensics: Educator and student perspectives. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100045

Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind : the theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.

González-Treviño, I. M., Núñez-Rocha, G. M., Valencia-Hernández, J. M., & Arrona-Palacios, A. (2020). Assessment of multiple intelligences in elementary school students in Mexico: An exploratory study. Heliyon, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03777

Helate, T. H., Metaferia, T. F., & Gezahegn, T. H. (2022). English language teachers’ engagement in and preference for experiential learning for professional development. Heliyon, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10900

Jacob, S. A., & Boyter, A. C. (2023). “Having Students is Entirely Necessary”: Tutors’ feedback of experiential learning in an MPharm programme (TELL Project). Studies in Educational Evaluation, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101234

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2016). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publication.

Kılıç, M. S., & Sert, H. (2015). Primary School 5th Grade Science and Technology Lesson Book’s Investigation of Multiple Intelligence Theory. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2577–2581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.935

Li, L., Huang, F., Chen, S., Pan, L., Zeng, W., & Wu, X. (2020). Exploring the curriculum development in content and language integrated learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 1102–1113. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20705

Monita, D., & Hasan, Moh. F. (2023). The Dynamics of Affective Assessment in MI Schools: Challenges and Solutions. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 9(1), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v9i1.769

Saunders, M., L., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students (7th ed.). pEARSON.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Wijanarko, B. D., Murad, D. F., Hassan, R., Leandros, R., & Sunardi. (2023). Minor Program Mapping based on Multiple Intelligences with Cluster Analysis Approach. Procedia Computer Science, 227, 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.527

Zohar, A. , & D. M. M. (2008). Experiential Learning in Formal and Non-Formal Education: Bridging the Gap. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1790–1796.