Effective Classroom Discipline Strategies for Maintaining School Discipline in Limpopo Province, South Africa: An Exploratory Study

  • Michael Mbongiseni Buthelezi University of Limpopo, Polokwane, Limpopo,  Afrika Selatan

Abstrak

Perilaku mengganggu di sekolah telah menjadi tantangan besar di mana guru dihadapkan pada siswa yang tidak tertib dan kurang hormat. Karena pemerintah telah menghapus tindakan hukuman seperti cambuk, strategi disiplin yang efektif seperti penguatan positif perlu diterapkan agar disiplin dipulihkan dan hubungan guru-siswa yang kuat terjalin kembali sehingga lingkungan kelas dan sekolah menjadi kondusif. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode campuran, dan desain penelitian yang dipilih adalah desain paralel konvergen yang memungkinkan peneliti untuk mengumpulkan data kualitatif dan kuantitatif secara bersamaan. Untuk pengumpulan data, peneliti melakukan survei dan wawancara terhadap guru dan siswa serta meninjau literatur sebelumnya tentang strategi disiplin yang efektif. Studi ini bertujuan untuk memahami sifat, tinjauan historis, dan dampak strategi disiplin reaktif dan proaktif beserta tantangan yang dihadapi ketika menerapkan strategi disiplin yang efektif tanpa menggunakan tindakan hukuman. Studi ini mengungkap bahwa ada tindakan disiplin lain yang memberikan hasil positif, namun tindakan tersebut membutuhkan waktu, dedikasi, dukungan, dan pelatihan berkelanjutan agar dapat sepenuhnya diterapkan dan digunakan di berbagai lingkungan sekolah dengan siswa dari berbagai latar belakang budaya.

Kata Kunci: perilaku mengganggu, strategi efektif disiplin kelas, disiplin sekolah, Afrika Selatan, hubungan guru-murid

Data Unduhan PDF

Data unduhan belum tersedia.
Diterbitkan
2026-09-30
Bagaimana cara mengutip:
Buthelezi, M. M. (2026). Effective Classroom Discipline Strategies for Maintaining School Discipline in Limpopo Province, South Africa: An Exploratory Study. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 11(2), 188-198. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v11i2.2568
Bagian
Artikel Penelitian
Abstrak viewed: 17 times
PDF (English) downloaded: 5 times

Referensi

Aloe, A. M., Amo, L. C. & Shanahan, M. E. (2014). Classroom management self-efficacy and burnout: A multivariate meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 101-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9244-0

Clark, V. L. & Ivankova, N. V. (2016). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Deutsch, M. & Coleman, P. T. (2019). The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. Wiley.

Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health services research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117

Flay, B.R., Allred, C.G., Lewis, K.M., Bavarian, N., Haynes, M. (2023). The Positive Action Program. In: Lovat, T., Toomey, R., Clement, N., Dally, K. (eds) Second International Research Handbook on Values Education and Student Wellbeing. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24420-9_17

Gregory, A., Skiba, R. J. & Mediratta, K. (2016). Eliminating disparities in school discipline: A framework for intervention. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 253-278. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X17690499

Gregory, A., Skiba, R. J. & Mediratta, K. (2017). The Promise of Restorative Practices to Transform Teacher-Student Relationships and Achieve Equity in School Discipline. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 27(1), 6-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2014.929950

Ivankova, N. V. (2017). Mixed methods applications in action research: From methods to community action. SAGE Publications.

Johnson, R. B. & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2016). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 14-26. https://doi.org./10.3102/0013189X033007014

Lembke, E. & McIntosh, K. (2022). Implementing and Sustaining School-Wide Systems: A Practical Guide for School Leaders. Routledge.

Losen, D. J. (2020). Suspended Education: Urban Middle Schools in Crisis. UCLA Civil Rights Project.

Marzano, R. J. & Simms, J. (2018). The Classroom Management Book. ASCD.

Maynard, B. R., Farina, A., Dell, N. A., & Kelly, M. S. (2019). Effects of trauma-informed approaches in schools: A systematic review. Campbell systematic reviews, 15(1-2), e1018. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1018

McIntosh, K. & Goodman, S. (2016). Integrated Multi-Tiered Systems of Support: Blending RTI and PBIS. Wiley.

Simonsen, B., & Sugai, G. (2019). School-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports: A systems-level application of behavioral principles. In S. G. Little & A. Akin-Little (Eds.), Behavioral interventions in schools: Evidence-based positive strategies (2nd ed., pp. 35–60). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000126-003.

Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, J., Myers, D. & Sugai, G. (2008). Evidence-Based Practices in Classroom Management: Considerations for Research to Practice. Education and Treatment of Children. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.0.0007

Strobel Education (2023). Do School Discipline Differently: Strategies for Implementing Positive Discipline. https://strobeleducation.com/blog/strategies-for-implementing-positive-school-discipline/

Sugai, G. & Horner, R.H. (2014). Positive Behavior Support, School-Wide. In Encyclopedia of Special Education (eds C.R. Reynolds, K.J. Vannest and E. Fletcher-Janzen). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118660584.ese1902

Tashakkori, A., Johnson, R., & Teddlie, C. B. (2021). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. (Vols. 1-0). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506350288