Analisis Diminutiv -chen Dan -lein Berbantuan Korpus Dalam Dongeng Karya Bruder Grimm

  • Heri Septian Munggaran Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta,  Indonesia
  • Sudarmaji Sudarmaji Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta,  Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v10i3.2387

Abstrak

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh masih terbatasnya kajian berbantuan korpus mengenai penggunaan diminutiv sufiks -chen dan -lein dalam teks sastra Jerman, khususnya dongeng karya Brüder Grimm. Penelitian bertujuan mendeskripsikan frekuensi, konteks penggunaan, dan fungsi semantis-pragmatik diminutiv dalam korpus dongeng. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain analisis konten berbantuan korpus terhadap 200 dongeng digital yang dianalisis menggunakan perangkat lunak AntConc. Data berupa kata yang mengandung sufiks -chen dan -lein dianalisis berdasarkan frekuensi, kolokasi, distribusi konteks, dan makna konotatifnya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat 524 kemunculan sufiks -chen dan 112 kemunculan sufiks -lein. Sufiks -chen lebih dominan dan cenderung mengekspresikan nuansa afektif seperti keakraban, kelembutan, dan empati, sedangkan -lein lebih terbatas dan relatif netral secara emosional. Penggunaan diminutiv berperan dalam membangun karakterisasi, atmosfer naratif, simbolisme, dan kedekatan emosional antara pembaca dan tokoh. Simpulan penelitian menegaskan bahwa diminutiv dalam dongeng tidak hanya berfungsi secara morfologis, tetapi juga sebagai perangkat stilistika dan pragmatik. Temuan ini berkontribusi pada kajian linguistik korpus dan stilistika sastra serta membuka peluang penelitian komparatif lintas genre dan bahasa.

Kata Kunci: Diminutiv, -chen dan -lein, Korpus, Dongeng, Bruder Grimm

Data Unduhan PDF

Data unduhan belum tersedia.
Diterbitkan
2026-06-03
Bagaimana cara mengutip:
Munggaran, H. S., & Sudarmaji, S. (2026). Analisis Diminutiv -chen Dan -lein Berbantuan Korpus Dalam Dongeng Karya Bruder Grimm. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 10(3), 2712-2720. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v10i3.2387
Terbitan
Vol 10 No 3 (2025): Edisi September 2025
Bagian
Artikel Penelitian

Copyright (c) 2026 Heri Septian Munggaran, Sudarmaji Sudarmaji

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstrak viewed: 9 times
PDF downloaded: 2 times

Referensi

Alexiadou, A., & Lohndal, T. (2023). Germanic diminutives: A case study of a gap in Norwegian. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 26(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-023-09141-7

Audring, J., Booij, G., & Jackendoff, R. (2017). Verbal diminutives between grammar and lexicon. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 2017 (pp. xx–xx). John Benjamins.

Bauer, L. (2015). The Oxford reference guide to lexical morphology. Oxford University Press.

Biber, D., & Egbert, J. (2018). Register variation online. Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dressler, W. U., & Merlini Barbaresi, L. (1994). Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and intensifiers in Italian, German, and other languages. Mouton de Gruyter.

Dudenredaktion. (2016). Duden: Die deutsche Rechtschreibung (27th ed.). Dudenverlag.

Grandi, N. (2017). Evaluatives in morphology. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.250

Grimmstories.com. (n.d.). Grimms Märchen: Alle Märchen der Brüder Grimm. https://www.grimmstories.com/de/grimm_maerchen/list

Hentschel, E., & Di Meola, C. (2018). The diminutive in German: Morphology, syntax, and semantics. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 30(3), 1–25.

Justan, R., Margiono, A. A., & Sumiati. (2024). Penelitian kombinasi (mixed methods). ULIL ALBAB: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 3(2).

Khan, A. (2023). The diminutive morphological function between English and Pashto languages: A comparative study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 536. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02004-2

Kilgarriff, A., & Grefenstette, G. (2019). Introduction to corpus linguistics. Routledge.

Kridalaksana, H. (2001). Kamus linguistik (Edisi ke-3). PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Lameli, A. (2018). The replacement of diminutive suffixes in the New High German period. Journal of Historical Linguistics, 8(2), 203–231. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.17014.lam

Lüdeling, A., & Kytö, M. (Eds.). (2017). Corpus linguistics: An international handbook. De Gruyter Mouton.

Mahlberg, M. (2016). Corpus stylistics. In M. Burke (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of stylistics (2nd ed., pp. 336–350). Routledge.

McIntyre, D., & Walker, B. (2019). Corpus stylistics: Theory and practice. Edinburgh University Press.

Merlini Barbaresi, L. (2021). Asymmetric use of diminutives and hypocoristics in language and discourse: Pragmatic and cultural perspectives. Language & Communication, 76, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.10.001

Padilla Cruz, M. (2020). Towards a relevance-theoretic approach to the diminutive morpheme. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 24(4), 774–795. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-4-774-795

Radden, G., & Dirven, R. (2007). Cognitive English grammar. John Benjamins.

Schneider, K. P. (2017). Diminutives in discourse: Form and function across languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 112, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.02.002

Semino, E., & Short, M. (2004). Corpus stylistics: Speech, writing and thought presentation in a corpus of English writing. Routledge.

Stubbs, M. (2005). Conrad in the computer: Examples of quantitative stylistic methods. Language and Literature, 14(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947005048873

Trubnikova, V. (2021). Pragmatic (in)appropriateness of diminutives in language communication. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 12(3), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2021-12-3-635-646