The effect of Learning Method and Adversity Intelligence on Student Learning Outcomes

  • Nur Hidayat Doctoral Degree Program in Education, Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Banten,  Indonesia
  • Yayat Ruhiyat Doctoral Degree Program in Education, Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Banten,  Indonesia
  • Nurul Anriani Doctoral Degree Program in Education, Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Banten,  Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v9i3.971

Abstract

Learning outcomes are fundamental elements in education that shape the direction of learning experiences and provide a concrete path for academic success. This study aims to determine the influence of adversity intelligence and learning approaches on student learning results. This study employs a factorial design, specifically a 2 x 2 factorial design. The target population and sample for this research consist of Class XI students enrolled at SMKN 1 Keramatwatu during the 2023/2024

academic year. The research sample consisted of one hundred class XI pupils, selected from a total population of two hundred individuals. This research employed random sampling procedures to achieve the appropriate sample size for their investigation. The research findings indicate that there are notable disparities in the impact of learning methods on student learning outcomes (F = 7.911 and Sig. value = 0.005 <0.05). Additionally, there are significant variations in the influence of adversity intelligence on student learning outcomes (F = 7.922 and Sig. value = 0.001 < 0.05). Furthermore, there is a significant interaction effect between learning methods and adversity intelligence on student learning outcomes. This study demonstrates that educators has the capacity to employ a wide range of effective teaching methodologies in order to enhance students' learning outcomes. In addition, educators have the capacity to evaluate students' resilience and adaptation in both academic and non-academic settings.

Keywords: Adversity intelligence, learning method, learning outcomes

PDF Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2024-05-01
How to Cite:
Hidayat, N., Ruhiyat, Y., & Anriani, N. (2024). The effect of Learning Method and Adversity Intelligence on Student Learning Outcomes. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 9(3), 1187-1193. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v9i3.971
Issue
Vol. 9 No. 3 (2024): Edisi September 2024
Section
Research Articles

Copyright (c) 2024 Nur Hidayat, Yayat Ruhiyat, Nurul Anriani

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract viewed: 146 times
PDF downloaded: 95 times

References

Ainun, R. A., Rosidah, & Hamda. (2022). The Effect of Learning Style, Emotional Intelligence, and Adversity Quotient on the Second-grade Students’ Mathematics Learning Achievement of Islamic Senior High School. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 2(2), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.35877/454ri.eduline746

Akbar, E., & Nurhidayati. (2018). Peningkatan Kinerja Melalui Servant Leadership, Disiplin Kerja Dan Kepuasan Kerja Pada Dinas Pertanian Kabupaten Demak. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis, 19(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/ekobis.19.1.35-48

Amon, L., & Anggal, N. (2021). Strategic management in implementing the “independence of learning” policy in private Catholic colleges: SWOT analysis. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Explorer, 1(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/https://doie.org/10.1018/IJMRE.2021644052

Arwaty, A., & Lullulangi, M. (2022). Discovery learning model as an effort to increase student interest and learning 0utcomes. Journal of Educational Science and Technology (EST), 8(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v8i1.35217

Begawanita, N. (2021). The influence of learning creativity, learning independence and e-learning on student learning outcomes. SSRN Electronic Journal, 6(2). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3767953

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). California: Sage Publication Inc.

De Jager, T. (2013). Guidelines to assist the implementation of differentiated learning activities in South African secondary schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2011.580465

Degeng, I. N. S. (2000). Metodologi Penelitian. Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.

Faigawati, F., Safitri, M. L. O., Dwi Indriani, F., Sabrina, F., Kinanti, K., Mursid, H., & Fathurohman, A. (2023). Implementation of differentiated learning in Elementary schools. Jurnal Inspirasi Pendidikan, 13(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.21067/jip.v13i1.8362

Fauziyati, K. (2020). Improving science learning outcomes through the application of discovery learning learning models to grade V Students of SD Negeri Ayah. Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHEs): Conference Series, 3(3), 478. https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v3i3.45897

Hidayat, N., Ruhiyat, Y., & Anriani, N. (2023). Improving student learning outcomes through differentiated learning and adversity intelligence. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 2(2), 352–359. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v2i2.135

Ismajli, H., & Imami-Morina, I. (2018). Differentiated instruction: understanding and applying interactive strategies to meet the needs of all the students. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11315a

Magdalena, I., Kamilah, N., Rachma Lestari, D., & Lestari, B. (2021). Analisis hasil belajar siswa kelas 3 MI Al-Gaotsiyah dimasa pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 3(2), 208–216.

Marantika, J. E. R. (2022). The relationship between learning styles, gender and learning outcomes. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i1.6681

Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. The American Psychologist, 59(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X

Purba, E. (2015). Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran dan kecerdasan adversiti terhadap hasil belajar evaluasi hasil belajar. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 17(1).

Safi’i, A., Muttaqin, I., Sukino, Hamzah, N., Chotimah, C., Junaris, I., & Rifa’i, M. K. (2021). The effect of the adversity quotient on student performance, student learning autonomy and student achievement in the COVID-19 pandemic era: evidence from Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08510

Salar, R., & Turgut, U. (2021). Effect of differentiated instruction and 5E Learning cycle on academic achievement and self-efficacy of students in physics lesson. Science Education International, 32(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v32.i1.1

Samsilayurni, S., Ismail, G., Nipriansyah, N., Susanto, E., & Viona, E. (2021). The effect of intellectual intelligence and adversity quotient on learning motivation. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 7(3), 400. https://doi.org/10.29210/020211181

Sitorus, P., Simanullang, E. N., Manalu, A., Laia, I. S. A., Tumanggor, R. M., & Nainggolan, J. (2022). Effect of differentiation learning strategies on student learning results. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(6), 2654–2661. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2114

Solfema. (2017). Adversity Intelligence as a contributing factor of tutor’s performance. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(11), 840–847. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1134472

Tiara, Ngampo, M. Y. A., & Azis, M. (2023). Pengaruh kecerdasan adversitas terhadap hasil belajar pembelajaran akuntansi pada siswa sekolah menengah atas di Kabupaten Bone. Pinisi, 3(2), 197–202.