Analisis Potensi RPP Education for Sustainable Development pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika SMA

  • Tirtandro Meda SMA Negeri 2 Wates, Kulon Progo, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta,  Indonesia

Abstract

The new sustainable development goals, approved by global leaders at the United Nations Sustainable Development Summit in 2015, reaffirms the critical need of instilling ESD principles at all levels of education. Education is reinforced as a crucial aim in the concrete 17 (SDGs) to help build a more sustainable, fair, and equal society. Additionally, the SDGs include several objectives and indicators of education. The study uses a qualitative approach. Qualitative descriptive research follows the purpose of the study to be carried out, to describe the suitability of learning tools for physics subjects with the spirit of education for sustainable development. From the analyzed lesson plans, information was obtained that the lesson plans that were created and used were not as expected, which wanted integration into education for sustainable development. More specifically, the competence of self-awareness is still minimal in facilitating students to reflect on their role in the local community and global society. Based on the study results, it can be concluded that the level of conformity of the lesson plan to the principles of education for sustainable development of physics teachers still ranges from 13% to 70%. The indicator that still needs a lot of attention from teachers in designing lesson plans is on the competence of students self-awareness.

Keywords: ESD, SDGs, Lesson Plans, Physics

PDF Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2022-08-16
How to Cite:
Meda, T. (2022). Analisis Potensi RPP Education for Sustainable Development pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika SMA. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 7(3), 344-352. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v7i3.446
Section
Research Articles
Abstract viewed: 69 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded: 52 times

References

Anggraini, P., & Kusniarti, T. (2017). Character and Local Wisdom-Based Instructional Model of Bahasa Indonesia in Vocational High Schools. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(5), 23-29. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133091

Berglund, T., & Gericke, N. (2016). Separated and integrated perspectives on environmental, economic, and social dimensions: An investigation of student views on sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 22(8), 1115–1138. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1063589

Boeve-de Pauw, J., Gericke, N., Olsson, D., & Berglund, T. (2015). The effectiveness of education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 7(11), 15693-15717. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71115693

Bungsu, R., Latif, M., & Anwar, K. (2021). Isu Global Manajemen Kualitas Total Dalam Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 1(10), 2139-2148. https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v1i10.381

Carpenter, D. (2018). Intellectual and physical shared workspace: Professional learning communities and the collaborative culture. International Journal of Educational Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2017-0104

Erwin, E., Rustaman, N.Y., Firman, H., & Ramalis, T.R. (2019). Instrumen Asesmen Pedagogical Content Knowledge dalam Konteks Pengembangan Keterampilan Komunikasi Saintifik pada Pembelajaran Fisika. Titian Ilmu: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Sciences, 11(2), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.30599/jti.v11i2.494

Heasly, B., Iliško, D., Salīte, I., & Lindner, J. (2020). The Value of Process and Pedagogy through the Sustainability Prism. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 11(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2020-0014

Heath, R.L. (2019). Global Interdependence and Risks. The Global Public Relations Handbook.

Hollis, J. L., Sutherland, R., Williams, A. J., Campbell, E., Nathan, N., Wolfenden, L., ... & Wiggers, J. (2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels in secondary school physical education lessons. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0504-0

Lavanya, B., & Saraswathi, S. (2014). Education for sustainable development. In National Conference on Management and Social Sciences–Its Impact on Sustainable Development (Vol. 25, p. 26th). http://ijitam.org/doc/21.pdf

Lee, M., & Louis, K. S. (2019). Mapping a strong school culture and linking it to sustainable school improvement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 81, 84-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.02.001

Makhrus, M., Harjono, A., Syukur, A., Bahri, S., & Muntari, M. (2018). Identifikasi kesiapan LKPD guru terhadap keterampilan abad 21 pada pembelajaran IPA SMP. Jurnal ilmiah profesi pendidikan, 3(2), 124-128. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v3i2.20

Mubin, H. (2018). Analisis Kompetensi Guru dalam Merencanakan dan Melaksanakan Pembelajaran Kimia Berbasis Kurikulum 2013 Studi Kasus di Kelas X SMA Negeri 6 Pontianak. Ar-Razi Jurnal Ilmiah, 6(2). 53-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.29406/ar-r.v6i2.1223

Mukarramah, M., Gani, A., & Winarni, S. (2021). Analisis Kesesuaian Perangkat Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran dengan Tuntutan Pembelajaran Abad 21. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 5(3), 233-241. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v5i3.21934

Olsson, L., Jerneck, A., Thoren, H., Persson, J., & O’Byrne, D. (2015). Why resilience is unappealing to social science: Theoretical and empirical investigations of the scientific use of resilience. Science advances, 1(4), e1400217. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400217

PBB. Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015 (A/70/L.1). 2015. Available online: http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld (accessed on 1 Mei 2022)

Pope, J., Bond, A.J., Hugé, J., & Morrison‐Saunders, A. (2017). Reconceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 62, 205-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.11.002

Prabawani, B., Hanika, I. M., Pradhanawati, A., & Budiatmo, A. (2017). Primary Schools Eco-Friendly Education in the Frame of Education for Sustainable Development. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(4), 607-616. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1144855

Purnamasari, S., & Hanifah, AN. (2021). Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) dalam pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan IPA, 1(2), 69-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.52434/jkpi.v1i2.1281

Rahman, I. S., Murnaka, N. P., & Wiyanti, W. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Laps (Logan Avenue Problem Solving)-Heuristik Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah. WACANA AKADEMIKA: Majalah Ilmiah Kependidikan, 2(1), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.30738/wa.v2i1.2556

Rositawati, D. N. (2018). Kajian Berpikir Kritis Pada Metode Inkuiri. In Prosiding SNFA (Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Aplikasinya) (Vol. 3, pp. 74-84). https://doi.org/10.20961/prosidingsnfa.v3i0.28514

Rukin. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Yayasan Ahmar Cendekia Indonesia.

Salte, I., Iliko, D., & Micule, I. (2015). ISE action research: Reorienting teachers dispositions towards ESD, Latvia. Leading practice publication: Professional development of university educators on Education for Sustainable Development in European countries, 105107. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&cluster=17171857623166023867&btnI=1&hl=en

Sinakou, E., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & van Petegem, P. (2017). Exploring the concept of sustainable development within education for sustainable development: implications for ESD research and practice. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 21, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-0032-8

UNESCO. Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2017; Available online: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002474/247444e.pdf (accessed on 3 Mei 2022).

Zulfikar, T. (2018). The Making of Indonesian Education: An overview on Empowering Indonesian Teachers. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities. http://dx.doi.org/10.14203/jissh.v2i0.19