Strategi Kesantunan dalam Penolakan Siswa terhadap Guru di SMA Negeri 2 Wates: Kajian Sosiopragmatik

  • Ayu Herawati Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta,  Indonesia
  • Tadkiroatun Musfiroh Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta,  Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to describe politeness strategies in students' refusal speech acts toward teachers at SMA Negeri 2 Wates through a sociopragmatic approach. The urgency of this study is based on the pronounced asymmetry in power relations between teachers and students in the school environment, which has the potential to trigger interpersonal conflicts when refusals occur. The approach used in this study is descriptive qualitative with a data corpus consisting of 25 authentic refusal utterances from students, obtained through note-taking techniques based on spontaneous observations in various school environments. Data were analyzed textually and contextually using Al-Sallal's classification of refusal strategies and Brown and Levinson's politeness theory. The results show that indirect refusal strategies heavily dominate students' communication with teachers, accounting for 96% or 24 utterances. These strategies are realized through providing reasons, self-deprecation, the use of adjuncts, and other forms of pragmatic mitigation. This study reveals a unique finding in the use of Javanese local linguistic markers such as pripun nggih, nyuwun sewu, and mboten usah, which function as crucial pragmatic mitigators to soften refusals. The novelty of this study confirms that pragmatic mitigation strategies influenced by Javanese cultural values, namely ewuh pakewuh, andhap asor, and ngajeni, are used by students to reduce face-threatening acts, maintain interpersonal harmony, and preserve respect toward teachers in everyday educational communication.

Keywords: linguistic politeness, refusal speech acts, sociopragmatics, teacher-student interaction

PDF Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2026-06-12
How to Cite:
Herawati, A., & Musfiroh, T. (2026). Strategi Kesantunan dalam Penolakan Siswa terhadap Guru di SMA Negeri 2 Wates: Kajian Sosiopragmatik. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 10(3), 2721-2728. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v10i3.2436
Section
Research Articles
Abstract viewed: 0 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded: 0 times

References

Al-Sallal, R. E. (2024). Pragmatic analysis of refusal strategies in spoken English of Bahraini and Indian L2 learners. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2321682. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2321682

Archer, D., Grainger, K., & Jagodziński, P. (Eds.). (2020). Politeness in Professional Contexts. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.

Chaidir, M., Syamsuddin, & Ulinsa. (2026). The politeness of teachers' imperative speech acts in teacher-student interactions in Senior High School: A sociopragmatic approach. Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), 7(1), 238-247. https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v7i1.2286

Chojimah, N. (2015). Refusal and politeness strategies in relation to social status: A case of face-threatening act among Indonesian university students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(5), 906-918. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0505.04

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Culpeper, J., Haugh, M., & Kádár, D. Z. (Eds.). (2017). The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7

Cutting, J., & Fordyce, K. (2021). Pragmatics: A Resource Book for Students (4th ed.). Routledge.

Dwiana, N. R., & Syahri, I. (2024). Indonesian EFL learners’ refusal: Refusal-speech act specific motivation on refusal realization. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 9(1), May 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v9i1.763

Ginting, K. L. V. B., & Pasaribu, A. N. (2023). Politeness strategies in classroom interaction between teacher and students and among students at Senior High School. IDEAS: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 11(1), 289-297. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v11i1.3799

Putri, D. P., Wijayanto, A., & Fauziati, E. (2023). Evaluating appropriateness of speech act of criticizing by Indonesian EFL learners: A pragmatic comprehension study. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(4), 4696-4710. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.3580

Sunendar, N. F., Sudana, D., & Gunawan, W. (2024). Face saving acts of Indonesian public figures in responding to criticism on social media. In N. Haristiani et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2023) (Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Vol. 832, pp. 333–336). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-376-4_42

Syaefudin, & Agustin. (2025). The role of interactive learning environment in developing student's character. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (JIP) STKIP Kusuma Negara, 17(1), 45–53.

Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8

Wijayanto, A., Laila, M., Prasetyarini, A., & Susiati. (2013). Politeness in interlanguage pragmatics of complaints by Indonesian learners of English. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 188-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n10p188

Yan, G., & Bidin, S. J. (2025). Refusal strategies and face concerns: A cross-cultural study of Chinese and Malaysian undergraduates. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(10), 132-151. https://journals.bilpubgroup.com/index.php/fls