Missing Concept Image dan Mis-in Concept Image pada Materi Segi Empat Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif

  • Agustine Dwi Kurniawati Pamarna Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Jawa Barat,  Indonesia
  • Dadang Juandi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Jawa Barat,  Indonesia
  • Al Jupri Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Jawa Barat,  Indonesia

Abstract

The relationship between types of quadrilaterals is one of the concepts that students must master. However, based on literature studies, a lot of students made mistakes in determining the relationship between types of quadrilaterals. This research aims to describe missing concept images and mis-in concept images on quadrilateral concepts. When a concept's example is classified as not being an example of that concept, it is called a missing concept image; conversely, when a concept's non-example is classified as an example of that concept. A factor which can affects students' concept image is cognitive style. This research used a qualitative research design with a hermeneutic phenomenological approach. The subjects of this research were two students in 7th grade, each with field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles. This research used two instruments, namely the GEFT test instrument to determine the type of student's cognitive style and a test instrument with two-tier multiple-choice questions to understand students' concept image of the relationship between types of quadrilaterals. The results of the research showed that missing concept images and mis-in concept images occurred in a student with field-dependent cognitive style, while in student with a field-independent cognitive style there was a mis-in concept image. The results of this research can be used as a consideration in designing learning that can minimizes concept image errors.

Keywords: concept image, missing concept image, mis-in concept image, quadrilaterals, cognitive style

PDF Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2024-07-21
How to Cite:
Pamarna, A. D. K., Juandi, D., & Jupri, A. (2024). Missing Concept Image dan Mis-in Concept Image pada Materi Segi Empat Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 9(3), 1788-1796. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v9i3.1289
Section
Research Articles
Abstract viewed: 113 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded: 55 times

References

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inguiry Research Design:Choosing Among Five Approaches. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53, Issue 9).

Crowley, M. (1987). The van Hiele model of the development of geometric thought. Learning and Teaching Geometry, K-12, 1–16. http://www.csmate.colostate.edu/docs/math/mathactivities/june2007/The van Hiele Model of the Development of Geometric Thought.pdf

Cunningham, R., & Roberts, A. (2010). Reducing the Mismatch of Geometry Concept Definitions and Concept Images Held by Pre-Service Teachers. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 1, 1–17.

Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings (Amsterdam University Press (ed.)).

Manen, M. van. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. The Althouse Press.

Mason, J. (2008). From concept images to pedagogic structure for a mathematical topic. Making the Connection: Research and Teaching in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 255–274. https://doi.org/10.5948/UPO9780883859759.021

Ngirishi, H., & Bansilal, S. (2019). An exploration of high school learners’ understanding of geometric concepts. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 77(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.33225/PEC/19.77.82

Nopriana, T. (2015). Disposisi Matematis Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Geometri van Hiele. FIBONACCI Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika & Matematika, 1(2), 80–94.

Purnomo, D. J., Asikin, M., & Junaedi, I. (2015). Tingkat Berpikir Kreatif Pada Geometri Siswa Kelas Vii Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Dalam Setting Problem Based Learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(2), 109–115.

Rustam, R. (2021). Penguasaan Konsep Geometri Pada Siswa Smp Kota Pontianak Tahun 2020. Jurnal Pembelajaran Prospektif, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.26418/jpp.v6i1.45787

Sıbıç, O., AKÇAY, B., & ARIK, M. (2022). Review of Two-tier Tests in the Studies: Creating a New Pathway for Development of Two-tier Tests. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(2), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.747981

Son, A. L., Darhim, & Fatimah, S. (2020). Students ’ Mathematical Problem -Solving Ability Based. 11(2), 209–222.

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitaif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

T.R., F. (2017). Geometry Concepts in Mathematics Perceived Difficult To Learn By Senior Secondary School Students in Ekiti State, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 07(01), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0701018390

Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305619

Tirosh, D., & Tsamir, P. (2021). Missing and Mis-in Concept Images of Parallelograms: the Case of Tal. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10175-0

Usiskin, Z., Griffin, J., Willmore, E., & Witonsky, D. (2007). The Classification of Quadrilaterals: A Study of Definition. Information Age Publishing.

Vinner, S. (1991). The Role of Definitions in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. Advanced Mathematical Thinking, June. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47203-1

Weber, K., Porter, M., & Housman, D. (2008). Worked examples and concept example usage in understanding mathematical concepts and proofs. In Making the Connection: Research and Teaching in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 245–252). https://doi.org/10.5948/UPO9780883859759.020

Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures tests. CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.