Kecerdasan Artifisial Generatif dalam Pembelajaran: Analisis Bibliometrik Tren Penelitian Global 2023-2026

  • Ikhwanul Furqon Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Sumatra Barat,  Indonesia
  • Fachri Fachri Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Sumatra Barat,  Indonesia
  • Laila Purwaningsih Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Sumatra Barat,  Indonesia
  • Veldry Phito Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Sumatra Barat,  Indonesia
  • Hendri Pratama SMK Negeri 2 Banda Aceh, Banda Aceh, Aceh,  Indonesia
  • Zelhendri Zen Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Sumatra Barat,  Indonesia

Abstract

This bibliometric study analyzes global research trends in generative artificial intelligence (AI) for education using 27 Scopus-indexed articles from 2023-2026. Data analysis was conducted in R Studio using bibliometrix package following PRISMA-ScR protocol. Results show a negative annual growth rate of -20.63%, reflecting stringent selection criteria rather than declining research interest. The average of 6.45 authors per document indicates strong interdisciplinary collaboration, while international collaboration remains limited at 21.05%. China dominates publication output, followed by Australia and USA. Four thematic clusters were identified: generative AI in learning, student self-efficacy, engineering education, and educational technology acceptance. Strategic thematic mapping reveals "students," "artificial intelligence," and "higher education" as motor themes, while adversarial machine learning and contrastive learning emerge as niche themes. The study concludes that fragmented research networks require enhanced international collaboration and deeper exploration of emerging themes. These findings provide a strategic roadmap for researchers, policymakers, and educators to address knowledge gaps and prioritize future research agendas in AI-enhanced education.

Keywords: artificial intelligence, generative AI, educational technology, bibliometric analysis, Scopus

PDF Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2026-09-18
How to Cite:
Furqon, I., Fachri, F., Purwaningsih, L., Phito, V., Pratama, H., & Zen, Z. (2026). Kecerdasan Artifisial Generatif dalam Pembelajaran: Analisis Bibliometrik Tren Penelitian Global 2023-2026. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v11i1.2255
Section
Literature Review
Abstract viewed: 0 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded: 0 times

References

Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories. SAGE Open, 9(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575

Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Rupture, reformation, or revolution? Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1234567

Bradford, S. C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137, 85-86.

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... & Wright, R. (2023). "So what if ChatGPT wrote it?" Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195842

Hermansyah, A., Kurniawati, S., & Setyosari, P. (2024). The role of self-efficacy in predicting students' acceptance of generative AI: A structural equation modeling approach. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 1234-1256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12345-6

Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317-323.

Nikolopoulou, Kleopatra. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Higher Education: Mapping the Potential. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 5(1), 2751-5503. https://www.jdet.net/download/generative-artificial-intelligence-and-sustainable-higher-education-mapping-the-potential-15860.pdf

Tricco, A. C., et al. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of internal medicine, 169(7), 467-473.

UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2023). UNESCO science report: The race against time for smarter development. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380723

Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., ... & Li, Y. (2023). A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education from 2010 to 2020. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100098

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2023). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8

Zhou, L., Wang, L., & Zhang, D. (2024). Mitigating algorithmic bias in educational AI: A cross-cultural framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(2), 789-807. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13245